A strong call from Felipe Hinojosa and Hugo Saucedo, 2 Latino Mennonites came out in The Mennonite, entitled “Why Mennonite Church USA Must Boycott Arizona”.
They ask that Convention boycott Arizona due to the state’s treatment of immigrants.
My last post came out opposed to this idea, but I have to reconsider in light of Latinos asking for the boycott. As the mist affected part of the church, their thoughts should have extra weight.
Convention was a formative experience, one that I think future youth will benefit from. It gave me an idea of the larger church and showed me there was a place for me. So I was not sure how I felt about the authors’ call for a Sabbatical year- in other words, canceling Convention.
Perhaps, they say, there can be a meeting of delegates elsewhere to work on church statements, etc. But no youth Convention.
Am the more I think about it, the more almost excited I get about the possibility. It could be a great time to reevaluate key aspects of Convention. I have long been uncomfortable with the youth worship sessions, and feel they don’t adequately reflect a large portion of Mennonite churches.
Maybe this is a chance to downsize convention- not in number of attendees, but in looking at creative ways to do it smaller. Maybe return to the camping out roots of Convention. Or maybe 5 smaller regional youth conventions, with people encouraged to attend in other regions if they have the financial means.
And this has just as much, if not more, possibility to make an impact on youth. It is a concrete action with real consequences that shows the love of Jesus towards the stranger in our land. It shows that following the way of Jesus may not be easy, or fun, but should be central to our decisions.
Boycotting Arizona for Convention would expose for thousands of youth a side of our church that has been heavy on words an light on (at least visible and tangible) deeds. It would teach the youth that stewardship is more than getting your money’s worth and pinching pennies, that it is using what God has provided in a way that brings life and the way of Jesus.
I see the issue of the money already paid (over $300,000, according to the Executive board) being a sticking point for many Mennonites. Could the church absorb that fee? Would Mennonites in favor of a boycott be willing to step up and help pay, which is oddly paradoxical, but I think may be the best solution? (If each person who would go to Convention otherwise pays about $40, a small portion of the cost to attend, the money would no longer be an issue.)
In his editorial, editor Everett J. Thoma brings up a point I hadn’t considered- in the case that Convention still happens in Arizona, will boycotting Arizona morph into a boycott of Convention? What would that do to church unity?
I’m seeing a lot of calls for creative solutions, a third way. What ideas do you have?