This is a song from La Misa Campesina Nicaragüense by Carlos Mejía Godoy. I encountered it on a trip to Guatemala, and loved the music and words. It keeps popping into my head 2 years later, and I thought I’d share it (and a rough English Translation) with you.
|Vos sos el Dios de los pobres
Vos sos el Dios de los pobres
El Dios humano y sencillo
El Dios que suda en la calle
El Dios de rostro curtido.
Por eso es que te hablo yo
Vos vas de la mano con mi gente
Vos comés raspando allá en el parque
Vos sos el Dios de los pobres…
Yo te he visto en uno pulpería
Yo te he visto en las gasolineras
Vas sos el Dios de los pobres…
|Translation (Please feel free to correct me)-
You are the God of the poor ones
This is why I speak to you
You walk hand in hand with my people
You eat ice cream? there in the park
I’ve seen you at the corner store
Goshen College, my alma mater, released its plans for implementing the decision to play the national anthem.
Part of the plan is to include a statement in the programs for events where the anthem is played. The statement includes the following-
Prior to the game, we will invite you to stand for the playing of the national anthem followed by a reading of the Peace Prayer of St. Francis of Assisi. We offer this time as space for people to respond respectfully as they wish, recognizing that these rituals represent different things to different people.
I think that’s a major point right there- these rituals represent different things to different people. Well, to be honest, the ritual of singing the national anthem before a sporting event means different things to different people. Because reading the Peace Prayer isn’t exactly what I’d call a ritual… yet.
To me, the national anthem (and the flag, the pledge, etc) is tied up in a ton of meaning, mostly not good. It represents the wars fought in the interest of making the rich richer and maintaining the status quo. It represents the assassinations of democratically elected leaders. It represents the genocide of the Native Americans, the centuries of slavery, internment of Japanese.
Not that the anthem doesn’t have good meanings to me- the humanitarian aid, the progress the country has made in regards to human rights, freedom of religion, etc. It’s just that the negative is inescapable for me.
But when I’m at a sport event, and I don’t sing along, I can’t explain that to the people around me. I just hope that they respect the fact that the anthem represents something different to me. And I do not begrudge anyone for singing the anthem. It means something different to them (at least I really hope it does), and I may even agree with what it means to them. But it isn’t what it means to me.
So while I’m torn on whether or not Goshen should play the anthem, I’m not torn on whether or not I personally will sing it, because of what that ritual represents to me.
I have a couple corrections I want to make clear about my post, Part of the body, not outside agitators. My anecdotes are faulty, but I still stand by the points I was making.
I contacted Pastor Marc Hershberger, whose quote about “outside sources” triggered my rant. He clarified that the outside sources he was referring to was not extra-Mennonite, as I read it to mean. He meant that since this was for pastors, he wanted this to be a forum for pastors, not from seminary professors. He brings up some good points on why this should be the case.
So to be clear, he was not referring to “outsiders” as I understood him to say. I apologize to him for assuming the meaning of his speech.
Also, Shawn, the Director of Six11 Ministries also posted a comment. He does indeed have Mennonite connections, but doesn’t put them on his web site-
Now, I consider myself first a Christian (a lover of Jesus), and then a (fill in denomination name). So, no, I do not have my Mennonite heritage on my site … sorry, I just don’t think it’s that important to note. Besides, six11 Ministries is a non-denominational ministry. We work with the Body of Christ, of which Mennonites (straight and gay) are a part of.
So I want to apologize to both of these men, and thank them for being willing to engage and clarify.
Found this on Digg- “Glenn Beck Urges Listeners to Leave Churches that Preach Social Justice”.
Am I surprised? Not really… here’s a Conservative telling Conservatives to leave churches that most Conservatives wouldn’t even think of attending anyways.
Beck’s reasoning is that social justice and economic justice leads to communism.
I’ve heard this before, and from inside the church. I had someone tell me they were concerned for “social justice-y people like me”, because the AntiChrist will be a man of peace, and will be the deceiver. So anyone who valued peace and justice is in grave danger of following the AntiChrist. So, you know, if I had any questions, I should ask him, because he has read up on the end times.
The problem, I think, is that Beck didn’t go far enough. Getting people to leave churches with a message of social or economic justice is maybe a good step- but why stop there? The Bible is full of this message. Jesus and the merchants in the temple. The Good Samaritan. The prophets preached social justice.
The sin of Sodom was not homosexuality, according to Ezekiel 16:49. “Behold, this was the guilt of your sister Sodom: she and her daughters had pride, excess of food, and prosperous ease, but did not aid the poor and needy.”
Micah 6:8 and other places throughout the Bible remind the reader to “DO Justice.” It’s a command.
How about James 1:27- “Religion that is pure and undefiled before God, the Father, is this: to visit orphans and widows in their affliction…”
The message of social and economic justice is an inescapable truth throughout the Bible. To expose yourself to the teachings of the Bible can and does lead to a revolutionary understanding of the world, and an understanding of how God is the God of the poor, the needy, the disenfranchised, and how it is part of our necessary work in this world to DO justice.
So Beck won’t meet his objective of eradicating social justice by simply getting people to leave churches that preach social justice. Because down the road, some child may pick up the Bible, start reading it, and have some funny notions that maybe God wants us to actually do justice here on earth.
No, to completely eradicate social justice, Beck needs to make a stand, and tell his listeners to throw away the Bible.
I’ve started getting a bit anxious whenever TMail, the weekly ezine from TheMennonite, hits my inbox every Monday. There’s always something that seems to make me sad, and makes me less hopeful for the future of the church. This week, that came in an article called, “Conference Affirms Teachings on Sexuality“.
First of all, it’s a tricky headline- the conference in question is not a upper-case-C Conference. It’s not Lancaster Conference or Franconia Conference or Pacific Southwest Conference. I read the article 3 or 4 times, trying to figure out what Conference this was, and finally figured out that there wasn’t a Conference involved. It was the “Affirming the Faith: What the Mennonite Church Believes about Homosexuality” conference. In other words, this was not a church body, but a group of pastors who are in the Mennonite Church. Nothing official happened.
I may get into the article/conference more at length later, but one thing that jumped out at me was something I’ve seen come up multiple times in regards to the PinkMenno movement. Read this quote [NOTE: In communicating with Hershberger after I wrote this post, it seems the "outside sources" was referring to seminary professors, and the need for the pastoral role in this situation, not outside agitators as I read it. Apologies for my misunderstanding. I do think that my general point still stands.]
“As this was a conference to encourage and equip members of our Mennonite community, the input was provided primarily by pastors from this community, rather than outside sources,” (Marc) Hershberger (pastor of Grace Mennonite Church in Lansdale, Pa.) said.
Who are this outside sources he speaks of? They obviously don’t need to be specified- you know who he means.
I actually wouldn’t, except I’ve seen this before. Hershberger is mirroring the idea heard from MCUSA leadership that PinkMenno, Open Letter, BMC, and other groups are influenced by some vague outsiders.
Outside agitators were blamed for the Civil Rights Movement, the Flour Riot of 1837, and many more recent riots and social movements in general. The thinking seems to be that “Obviously, this outrageous thinking couldn’t possibly be coming from inside our community- it must be people from the outside.”
This was reflected in the Fact Sheet put out by the Immigrant Church Leaders-
Most Mennonites seem not to be aware of the funds, training and support pro-LGBT Mennonites receive from secular LGBT groups.
Obviously, these gullible youngsters are being influenced by others. Don R. Martin’s Letter to the Editor in TheMennonite calls the PinkMenno press conference that was held at Columbus 2009 “inappropriate” and said it “demonstrated a remarkable ignorance of Anabaptist-Mennonite history”. The PinkMenno campaign, in his view, was asking for the outside world to put pressure on the church.
But the people of Pink Menno are not outside agitators, bent on the destruction of the Mennonite Church. In talking with other people involved in these Movements, looking over the lists of people who have signed the Open Letter, and in general, my feeling is that these are pastors, professors at Mennonite institutions, and people in general who are invested in the Mennonite Church. They are people who see the brokenness in the church, but still see enough value in it that they deem it worth their time and trouble to work towards what they see as a better, more Christ-like church.
Back to the original article, I think it is important to note that there were “outside agitators” at this conference. They invited Harvest USA and Six11 Ministries (note- Six11 Ministries does have Mennonite ties- see Shawn’s comment below) to speak. In looking at their sites, it appears that there is no Mennonite affiliation- if you can find one, let me know. The message, to me, is clear- outsiders who agree with them are welcome, but dissenting opinions from Mennonites are not.
So call me an agitator, for I don’t hesitate to agitate when there is need. Just don’t call me an outsider.